Science with Passion
Application No.: VFD0190 Version 1 10/2021
Sugar screening using Eurokat columns
K. Oliynyk, S. Stephan, Y. Krauke, K. Monks; applications@knauer.net
KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH, Hegauer Weg 38, 14163 Berlin
Foto: freepik.com/white-sugar
Summary
In biorefineries, bacteria and yeast are used for the fermentation of C5 and C6 sugars into bio-ethanol. The by-products from bio-ethanol production are also of value and can be used in other applications. To determine the most suitable column for the analysis of fermentation samples, sugar and sugar alcohol standards were screened using ion exchange Eurokat columns. Measurements using these columns enable the identification and quantification of fermentation broth components, as well as the determination of any impurities that may be present. Screenings using Eurokat Ca, Na, Pb and H columns provided high detection and separation performance for sugars and sugar alcohols. This performance demonstrated that Eurokat columns are suitable for the separation of biorefinery products, as well as for other applications.
Introduction
Eurokat columns separate substances via a combination of size exclusion and ligand exchange mechanisms. The column packing material is composed of sulfonated cross-linked styrene-divinylbenzene. These polymers are extremely stable in aqueous media over the entire pH-range, resulting in the longer lifetime of Eurokat columns when compared to conventional silica-based columns. By modification of the column with Ca-, Na-, Pb- and H-Ions different column-sample interactions can be selected for, allowing for the selection of different separation dynamics.
Due to their high functional group density, Eurokat columns are recommended for ion exclusion, size exclusion and ligand exchange chromatography. Eurokat H is suitable for the determination of organic acids, including complex mixtures, carbohydrates, alcohols and sugar alcohols. Eurokat Ca and Pb work optimally for the determination of carbohydrates with a degree of polymerization (DP) < 4 and are not suitable for higher carbohydrates. Eurokat Na is suitable for the analysis of oligosaccharides with a DP of up to 6.(1) To acquire an overview of the separation specifications of these columns and to enable a comparison of their screening results, sixteen sugar and sugar alcohol standards were screened using four ion exchange columns.
Sample Preparation
All standards were dissolved in distilled water (concentration 10 mg/ml) and filtered with Sartorius RC 0.45 µm syringe filters. The stock solutions were diluted to 2 mg/ml before injection.
Results
Sixteen sugars and sugar alcohols were screened using four differently modified columns: Eurokat Ca, Na, Pb and H. Eurokat Ca demonstrated the best separation of regarded samples out of all the columns. Different substance classes eluted from this column as groups of different retention times tR: oligosaccharides had the shortest retention (tR < 13 min), monosaccharides were found in the middle of the peak distribution (13 < tR < 20 min) and sugar alcohols were retained the longest (tR > 20 min). All measured standards are listed in eluting order in Tab. 2.
Fig. 1 Measurement of sugar standards on the Eurokat Ca column. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl. Components are listed in Tab. 2
Eurokat Na is suitable for the detection of oligosaccharides and their separation from other substances, however it is not suitable for the separation of mixtures of oligosaccharides.
The chromatogram for Eurokat Na showed an inconsistent peak distribution. Oligosaccharides (1–4 in Fig . 2), as well as monosaccharides and sugar alcohols (8–13 in Fig . 2), showed similar retention times, meaning their separation was not possible. A mixture consisting of an oligosaccharide with a monosaccharide or a sugar alcohol could however be separated using this column. Eurokat Na allowed for the separation of mixtures, e.g. arabinose and fructose, that cannot be separated using a Eurokat Ca column (Fig. 6). Retention times of all the measured standards are listed in Tab. 3.
Fig. 2 Measurement of sugar standards on the Eurokat Na column. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl. Components are listed in Tab. 3
Measurements using the Eurokat Pb column showed the highest retention times of all 4 columns. Similarly to the Eurokat Ca-column, oligosaccharides eluted from Eurokat Pb at low retention times (tR < 18 min), followed by monosaccharides (18 < tR < 24 min) and then sugar alcohols at high retention times (tR > 24 min) (Fig. 3).
The elution range for the sugar alcohols was found to exceed 25 minutes. Eurokat Pb allowed not only the separation of different substance types but also the separation of sugar alcohols from one-another.
A list of all the standards measured using this column and their retention times are shown in Tab. 4. Although a Pb modified column can be used in analysis stages they cannot be used in purification applications in the food industry, because of lead´s neurotoxicity.(2)
Fig. 3 Measurement of sugar standards on the Eurokat Pb column. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl. Components are listed in Tab. 4
Eurokat H showed a separation of lower resolution than Eurokat Ca, however some specific substances could be effectively separated using this column, e.g. rhamnose and glucose (Fig. 8). Sucrose interacts with H-Ions on the column´s surface, resulting in its breakdown into two respective monomers with merging peaks (Fig. 4). This problem does not occur to any other oligosaccharides tested in this experiment. The three other disaccharides measured in this experiment eluted from the column at low retention times (< 8 min). All measured standards with their retention times are listed in Tab. 5.
Fig. 4 Measurement of sugar standards on the Eurokat H column. Flow rate 0.7 ml/min, temperature 60 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl. Components are listed in Tab. 5
In Fig. 5–8 the separation of different substance pairs using Eurokat Ca and the other Eurokat models were compared to highlight any differences in the separation properties of the columns.
Fig. 5 Glucose (red) and mannitol (blue) measured with Eurokat Na (above) and Eurokat Ca (below) columns. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl.
In Fig. 5 Eurokat Ca showed a clear baseline separation of glucose and mannitol (Resolution = 10.59), whilst the peaks of the same components eluted from Eurokat Na almost simultaneously (Resolution = 0.26). On the contrary, Fig. 6 shows that arabinose and fructose can be better separated using Eurokat Na (Resolution = 1.94) when compared to Eurokat Ca (Resolution = 0.21).
Fig. 6 Arabinose (red) and fructose (blue) measured with Eurokat Na (above) and Eurokat Ca (below) columns. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl
In most cases the Eurokat Ca is suitable for baseline or close-to-baseline separation. However, there are some sugar mixtures where other column modifications are required in order to achieve satisfactory separation. An example for each column (Eurokat Pb and H) is shown in Fig. 7 and 8.
Fig. 7 Arabinose (red) and fructose (blue) measured with Eurokat Pb (above) and Eurokat Ca (below) columns. Flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C, sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl.
Fig. 7 shows that the separation of arabinose and fructose is significantly improved when using Eurokat Pb (Resolution = 1.80) than when using Eurokat Ca (Resolution = 0.21).
Fig. 8 Rhamnose (red) and glucose (blue) measured with Eurokat H (above) and Eurokat Ca (below) columns. Ca: flow rate 0.5 ml/min, temperature 75 °C; H: flow rate 0.7 ml/min, temperature 60 °C; sample concentration 2 mg/ml, injection volume 20 µl.
Although rhamnose and glucose were separable using both columns, a baseline separation was only possible using Eurokat H (Resolution = 3.11). The resolution using Eurokat Ca was 0.94.
Conclusion
Sixteen sugar and sugar alcohol standards were screened using the Eurokat Ca, Na, Pb and H columns. Comparison of the elution profiles of the standards demonstrated (Fig. 1–4), that the Ca- and Pb- modified columns provided the best sample distribution for this substance range.
To determine the most suitable column for a separation, it is useful to know (or have at least a presumption of) the sample composition. As shown in Fig. 1–4 oligosaccharides elute at low, monosaccharides at mid-range and sugar alcohols at high retention times.
When using Eurokat Na and H columns monosaccharides and sugar alcohols eluted in the same time range. Each column has its own elution range, so it is not possible to define general retention time limits for every type of substance in each of the columns. The choice of which column to use for a particular experiment should be based on the composition of the sample. Depending on the sample composition, sometimes an analysis that uses two different Eurokat columns may be necessary.
A high peak resolution (Res) results in better separation. A one hundred percent separation is achievable at Res = 2.(3) Retention times for all of the measured standards when using each of the referenced columns are listed in the Tab. 2–5.
If Eurokat columns are applied for purification tasks it is important to consider that the use of lead in the food sector is not allowed because of its toxicity, therefore the Eurokat Pb column is not suitable for purification purposes in the food industry.
Materials and Methods
The analysis of sugars requires an isocratic HPLC system equipped with a degasser, autosampler, column oven and a refractive index detector. Other configurations are also available. Please contact KNAUER to configure a system that fits your needs. To protect the column from sample impurities installation of a pre-column packed with the same material as the main column is always recommended.
Tab. 1 Measured analytes
Analyte | CAS# | Chemical | Chemical |
Sucrose | 57-50-1 | C12H22O11 | |
D-(-)-Fructose | 57-48-7 | C6H12O6 | |
D-(+)-Galactose | 59-23-4 | C6H12O6 | |
D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | 6363-53-7 | C12H22O11 · H2O | |
D-(+)-Mannose | 3458-28-4 | C6H12O6 | |
D-(+)-Glucose | 14431-43-7 | C₆H₁₂O₆ | |
D-(+)-Xylose | 58-86-6 | C5H10O5 | |
L-(+)-Arabinose | 5328-37-0 | C5H10O5 | |
D-(+)-Cellobiose | 528-50-7 | C12H22O11 | |
L-Rhamnose monohydrate | 10030-85-0 | C6H12O5 · H2O | |
D-Lactose monohydrate | 64044-51-5 | C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁ | |
D-Mannitol | 69-65-8 | C6H14O6 | |
Xylitol | 87-99-0 | C5H12O5 | |
L-(-)-Arabitol | 7643-75-6 | C5H12O5 | |
Glycerol | 56-81-5 | C3H8O3 | |
D-Sorbitol | 50-70-4 | C6H14O6 |
Tab. 2 List of retention times of all standards with Eurokat Ca column
No. | Sugar | Retention time (min) |
1 | D-(+)-Cellobiose | 11.79 |
2 | Sucrose | 11.84 |
3 | D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | 12.07 |
4 | D-Lactose monohydrate | 12.72 |
5 | D-(+)-Glucose | 14.48 |
6 | L-Rhamnose monohydrate | 15.32 |
7 | D-(+)-Xylose | 15.47 |
8 | D-(+)-Galactose | 16.35 |
9 | D-(+)-Mannose | 16.43 |
10 | D-(-)-Fructose | 18.03 |
11 | D-(+)-Arabinose | 18.23 |
12 | Glycerol | 20.84 |
13 | L-(-)-Arabitol | 24.36 |
14 | D-Mannitol | 24.44 |
15 | Xylitol | 28.81 |
16 | D-Sorbitol | 30.09 |
Tab. 3 List of retention times of all standards with Eurokat Na column
No. | Sugar | Retention time (min) |
1 | D-(+)-Cellobiose | 9.85 |
2 | Sucrose | 9.95 |
3 | D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | 10.12 |
4 | D-Lactose monohydrate | 10.23 |
5 | D-(+)-Glucose | 13.08 |
6 | D-Mannitol | 13.22 |
7 | L-Rhamnose monohydrate | 13.43 |
8 | D-Sorbitol | 13.91 |
9 | D-(+)-Galactose | 14.06 |
10 | D-(+)-Mannose | 14.16 |
11 | L-(-)-Arabitol | 14.19 |
12 | D-(+)-Xylose | 14.31 |
13 | D-(-)-Fructose | 14.33 |
14 | Xylitol | 14.94 |
15 | D-(+)-Arabinose | 15.54 |
16 | Glycerol | 16.09 |
Tab. 4 List of retention times of all standards with Eurokat Pb column
No. | Sugar | Retention time (min) |
1 | Sucrose | 15.23 |
2 | D-(+)-Cellobiose | 15.43 |
3 | D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | 16.34 |
4 | D-Lactose monohydrate | 17.24 |
5 | D-(+)-Glucose | 18.12 |
6 | L-Rhamnose monohydrate | 18.53 |
7 | D-(+)-Xylose | 18.71 |
8 | D-(+)-Galactose | 21.22 |
9 | D-(+)-Arabinose | 22.18 |
10 | D-(+)-Mannose | 22.84 |
11 | D-(-)-Fructose | 23.59 |
12 | Glycerol | 25.62 |
13 | L-(-)-Arabitol | 36.18 |
14 | D-Mannitol | 37.31 |
15 | Xylitol | 46.27 |
16 | D-Sorbitol | 52.42 |
Tab. 5 List of retention times of all standards with Eurokat H column
No. | Sugar | Retention time (min) |
1 | D-(+)-Cellobiose | 6.97 |
2 | D-(+)-Maltose monohydrate | 7.11 |
3 | D-Lactose monohydrate | 7.27 |
4 | D-(+)-Glucose | 8.61 |
5 | D-(+)-Mannose | 9.14 |
6 | D-(+)-Galactose | 9.16 |
7 | D-(+)-Xylose | 9.21 |
8 | D-(-)-Fructose | 9.30 |
9 | D-Mannitol | 9.62 |
10 | L-Rhamnose monohydrate | 9.75 |
11 | D-Sorbitol | 9.79 |
12 | D-(+)-Arabinose | 10.02 |
13 | L-(-)-Arabitol | 10.43 |
14 | Xylitol | 10.68 |
15 | Glycerol | 12.69 |
0 | Sucrose | ––––– |
Tab. 6 Method parameters
Value Ca, Na and Pb | Value H column | |
Column temperature | 75 °C | 60 °C |
Injection volume | 20 µL | 20 µL |
Injection mode | Partial Loop | Partial Loop |
Detection | RI | RI |
Data rate | 10 Hz | 10 Hz |
Tab. 7 Pump program
Value Ca, Na and Pb columns | Value H column | |
Eluent (A) | water | 0.01 N – H2SO4 in water |
Flow rate | 0.5 ml/min | 0.7 ml/min |
Gradient | isocratic | isocratic |
Configuration of the system used in this application is listed in Tab. 8. Method parameters and pump program for each column are shown in Tab. 6–7.
Tab. 8 System configuration
Instrument | Description | Article No. |
Pump 1 | AZURA P6.1L LPG | |
Autosampler | AZURA AS 6.1L | |
Detector | AZURA RID 2.1L | |
Thermosthat | AZURA CT 2.1 | |
Column | Eurokat Ca, 10 µm, Column 300 x 8 mm | |
Eurokat Na, 10 µm, Column 300 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat Pb, 10 µm, Column 300 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat H, 10 µm, Column 300 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat Ca, 10 µm, Column 30 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat Na, 10 µm, Column 30 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat Pb, 10 µm, Column 30 x 8 mm | ||
Eurokat H, 10 µm, Column 30 x 8 mm | ||
Software | ClarityChrom (version 8.2.2.102) |
Information about the minimum configuration of the Sugar Screening System: A46014
References
[1] Column Care and Regeneration – Eurokat
https://knauer.ninoxdb.com/share/t4k9pbc15ol26kakcxozijm8n7qhzv0rtnlf
[2] EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Scientific Opinion on Lead in Food. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(4):1570. [151 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1570
Chemical structures image source: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/
[3] Gaby Aced, Hermann J. Möckel, Liquidchromatographie: Apparative, theoretische und methodische Grundlagen der HPLC, Weinheim; New York; Basel; Cambridge: VCH, 1991, p. 29–30
Fig. 9 Instrument composition
Related KNAUER Applications
VFD0150 Alternative xylitol extraction via HPLC purification from fermented biomass
VFD0148J Determination of mannose and mannooligosaccharides with an improved RI detector
VFD0149J Determination of xylitol in microbial fermentation broth
VFD0160 Determination of sugars and natural sugar substitutes in different matrices
VFD0187 Eurokat column coupling
Application details
Method |
HPLC |
Mode |
Ion exclusion, Ligand exchange |
Substances |
Sucrose, Fructose, Galactose, Maltose monohydrate, Mannose, Glucose, Xylose, Arabinose, Cellobiose, Rhamnose monohydrate, Lactose monohydrate, Mannitol, Xylitol, Arabitol, Glycerol, Sorbitol |
CAS number |
57-50-1, 57-48-7, 59-23-4, 6363-53-7, 3458-28-4, 14431-43-7, 58-86-6, 5328-37-0, 528-50-7, 10030-85-0, 64044-51-5, 69-65-8, 87-99-0, 7643-75-6, 56-81-5, 50-70-4 |
Version |
Application No.: VFD0190 | Version 1 10/2021 | ©KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH |