Science with Passion

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV

Application No.: VCH0020 
Version 1  11/2021

DOWNLOAD




Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV

L. Loxterkamp, K. Monks; applications@knauer.net

KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH, Hegauer Weg 38, 14163 Berlin

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV

Photo: Fotolia

Summary

Seven different aroma oils from various manufacturers were tested using a validated cannabinoid analysis method and a KNAUER AZURA® HPLC system. The analysis method can be used to quantify 6 different cannabinoids and to qualify 16 cannabinoids within 22 min. Here it was demonstrated that this method can be used to verify the compliance of cannabis-derived products with German narcotics laws [1], meaning the method can be used for quality control purposes. In this case all of the tested aroma oils were below the critical limit of 0.2 % total THC content, while three of the products had no THC content at all.

Introduction

Cannabidiol (CBD) in various products, such as tea, chocolate, gum, or oils has been a hot topic for several years now. Compared to ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) products containing the non-psychoactive CBD does not require a special authorisation via the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesopiumstelle of the Bundesinstitut für Arznei- mittelzulassung, BfArM) [2]. The legal situation regarding the sale of CBD-containing products is still not completely clarified. There are constant changes in the declaration of the products. For example, there are several requests to the Novel Food Regulation (EU 2015/2283) where manufacturers are re-evaluating their foodstuffs to obtain approval of their products [3]. Nevertheless, to verify the products compliance quality control is required. This is especially the case when measuring the total THC content (∆9-THC, ∆8-THC, ∆9-THCA), a critical parameter that may not be exceeded by 0.2 %. For all foodstuffs different limits of THC content are set by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, BfR). For example, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages should not exceed an amount of 5 µg/kg, whereas edible oils should fall below 5000 µg/kg [4].

For continuous quality controls a High Pressure Liquid Chromatography system (HPLC) makes it possible to verify and monitor the quality of THC containing products to prevent product recalls, such as the one experienced by the discounter LIDL in August 2021 [5]. With this work an exemplary analysis of seven different CBD aroma oils was conducted to verify the cannabinoid content using the developed method from the Application Note VPH0070 [6].

Sample Preparation

50 mg of oil was extracted in 10 ml methanol for 15 min inside an ultra-sonic bath, with shaking onto a vortex device every 5 min. After filtrating over a 0.20 μm PTFE syringe filter the solution was measured with the HPLC system. Each oil was prepared and measured in a double determination.

Results

Following the German pharmacopeia method (DAB) [7] six cannabinoids (CBD, CBDA, CBN, ∆9-THC, ∆8-THC, ∆9-THCA) were quantified and a qualification and assignment can be made with 16 different cannabinoids (VPH0070) [6]. Fig. 1 shows the overlay of an analysed sample with a cannabinoid standard. Fig. 2 shows a closer look of the qualified cannabinoids. The calculation for the total amount of THC and CBD was made using a factor of 0.877, which resulted from dividing the molar masses of the neutral (CBD) towards the acid (CBDA) form.

For example, the total amount of CBD with single values of 1.94 % CBDA and 3.28 % CBD is 4.98 %, following the equation from (1.1).

(1.1)

Overlay of quantitative 10 µg/mL standard mix (blue) and sample 3, 1:10 dilution with MeOH (red) 1. CBDVA 2. CBDV 3. CBDA 4. CBGA 5. CBD 6. CBN 7. ∆9-THC 8. ∆8-THC 9. CBC 10. ∆9-THCA 11. CBLA

Fig. 1 Overlay of quantitative 10 µg/mL standard mix (blue) and sample 3, 1:10 dilution with MeOH (red) 1. CBDVA 2. CBDV 3. CBDA 4. CBGA 5. CBD 6. CBN 7. ∆9-THC 8. ∆8-THC 9. CBC 10. ∆9-THCA 11. CBLA

Exemplary chromatogram from Sample 3, 1:10 dilution with MeOH, 1. CBDVA 2. CBDV 3. CBDA 4. CBGA 5. CBD 7. ∆9-THC 8. ∆8-THC 9. CBC 10. ∆9-THCA 11. CBLA

Fig. 2 Exemplary chromatogram from Sample 3, 1:10 dilution with MeOH, 1. CBDVA 2. CBDV 3. CBDA 4. CBGA 5. CBD 7. ∆9-THC 8. ∆8-THC 9. CBC 10. ∆9-THCA 11. CBLA

Using the, previously validated, method according to Guideline ICHQ2R1 the measurement of seven different CBD aroma oils was performed – the results of this analysis are shown in Tab. 1. These results are compared to the manufacturer’s declared specification in Tab. 2. By means of total amount of THC or CBD the specification is fulfilled with the measurement. Only the deviation of 4.99 % towards 5.35 % of total CBD with sample 5 is not comparable.

Tab. 1 Results of the six validated cannabinoids

Results of the six validated cannabinoids

Tab. 2 Results in comparison with specification declared by manufacturer. Values are mean values by double determination

Results in comparison with specification declared by manufacturer. Values are mean values by double determination

Conclusion

In summary, it was shown that the method used is appro- priate for the qualification and quantification of different cannabinoids in CBD aroma oils. All given specifications from the manufactures were fulfilled, whereas the only deviation was with sample 5. A potential reason for this deviation could be the use of a different sample preparation method or analytical determination. Most importantly, the legal limit of THC content below 0.2 % was undercut in every sample.

Materials and Methods


System configuration

Instrument

Description

Article No.

Pump

AZURA P 6.1l (LPG), with 10 ml pump head (stainless steel), degasser and mixer (200 µl)

APH34EA

Autosampler

AZURA AS 6.1l analytical HPLC autosampler, 700 bar

AAA00AA

Detector

AZURA MWD 2.1l multiwavelength detector

ADB01

Flow cell

Flow Cell Cartridge 10 mm path length, 10 µl, 300 bar

AMC38

Thermostat

AZURA CT 2.1 for up to 8 HPLC columns

ATC00

Column

Eurospher II 100-3 C18P, 150 x 4.6 mm

15VE182E2G

Software

ClarityChrom 8.3.

A1670

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV Method parameters

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV Pump parameters

Abbreviations

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV Abbreviations

Comparing CBD aroma oils with HPLC-UV System Configuration

References

[1] Gesetz über den Verkehr mit Betäubungsmitteln (BtMG) Anlage I (zu § Abs.1) (nicht verkehrsfähige Betäubungsmittel), 2001.

[2] Gesetz über den Verkehr mit Betäubungsmitteln
„Betäubungsmittelgesetz in der Fassung der Bekannt- machung vom 1. März 1994 (BGBl. I S. 358), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 der Verordnung vom 2. Juli 2018 (BGBl. I S. 1078) geändert worden ist “. BtMG, 1981

[3] Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015, 2015.

[4] Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung, BgVV empfiehlt Richtwerte für THC (Tetrahydrocannabinol) in hanfhalti- gen Lebensmitteln, 07.2000.

[5] J. Borsch, THC in Hanf Produkten: Wie viel ist erlaubt? DAZ, 26.08.2021

[6] L. Loxterkamp, S. Stephan, K. Monks, (C)an(n)alyze: determination of 16 cannabinoids inside flowers, oils, and seeds, VPH0070, KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH, 2019.

[7] L. Loxterkamp, K. Monks, Analyzing cannabis flow- ers according to the German Pharmacopeia – mono- graph 2018, VPH0072, KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH, 2019.

Related KNAUER Applications

VPH0070 – (C)an(n)alyze: determination of 16 cannabinoids inside flowers, oils and seeds

VPH0072 – Analyzing cannabis flowers according to the German Pharmacopeia – monograph 2018

Application details

Method

HPLC

Mode

RP

Substances

CBC, CBCA, CBDV, CBDVA, CBD, CBDA, CBG, CBGA, CBN, CBNA, CBL, CBLA, Δ9-THC, Δ9-THCA, Δ8-THC, THCV, THCVA

CAS number

20675-51-8, 185505-15-1, 24274-48-4, 31932-13-5, 13956-29-1, 1244-58-2, 25654-31-3, 25555-57-1, 521-35-7, 2808-39-1, 21366-63-2, 5957-75-5, 1972-08-3, 23978-85-0, 28172-17-0, 39986-26-0, 405

Version

Application No.: VCH0020 | Version 1  11/2021 | ©KNAUER Wissenschaftliche Geräte GmbH